A Natural Law View On Assisted Suicide - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 8 Words: 2546 Downloads: 5 Date added: 2019/05/31 Category Law Essay Tags: Assisted Suicide Essay Did you like this example? To the common person, the term natural law may not hold much significance or may register in their mind as a type of law that is of the earth or based on nature. While this may seem like the right definition, it is not the case. The idea of Natural law is one which has a very broad range of application and is generally misapplied when the term is incorporated in the topics of science, philosophy, history, theology, and law. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "A Natural Law View On Assisted Suicide" essay for you Create order According to allaboutphilosophy.org, Natural Law is a moral theory of jurisprudence, which maintains that law should be based on whatrs correct. (1) Furthermore, they state that Natural Law is discovered by humans through the use of reason and choosing between good and evil. (1) Because of this, Natural Law is seen as a consistent method of reason which can be held universally in its standards of morality and ethics. A commonly debated topic which is rooted in morality is that of assisted suicide and whether the actions taken by the one committing suicide and the one helping are moral or not. Assisted suicide and euthanasia are topics which have been looked at in the United States as uncommon practice for much of the early 1900s until the mid-70s and 80s, which is when the idea began to gain pubic attention and traction within the Supreme Court. The general idea in question when it comes to assisted suicide, is whether it is moral for a person to decide that they are ready to die and for someone to help them accomplish that desire. While over the years, the general view has been that suicide and assisted suicide is wrong and by all costs should be avoided. By looking at assisted suicide through the lens of Natural Law, I believe that assisted suicide could be allowed to let people could choose their own death. The only problem with this idea is that Natural Law is a body of unchanging moral princ iples which is regarded as the basis for how all humanity conducts themselves. This means that everyone would have the opportunity to choose assisted suicide if they so desired. Professor Robert George recognizes the Natural Law as central to the Western tradition of thought and morality, politics and law. (2) Furthermore, Americars founding fathers sought to create institutions and procedures that enshrined those basic, natural rights that people possess, not as privileges or opportunities granted by the state, but as principles of Natural Law which it is the moral duty of the state to respect and protect. (3) Through this, people may believe that they have the right to act in whatever way they see necessary, which can be defended by saying that it is within the Natural Law for them to act in this manner. The aspect that they are not addressing is whether the actions are moral or not, which in the case of assisted suicide, they do not appear to be moral. Although there has been much debate on whether assisted suicide decisions fit within the boundaries of Natural Law, there has been a push from the opposition on whether the rights from the Natural Law should be upheld and whether the justifications by Natural Law can bridge the gap between the schools of thought of Christianity and that of secular ethics within todays world. Craig Paterson speaks on how the laws of nature describe how physical entities act, Laws of nature are descriptive not prescriptive. These uniformities or regularities simply are. Physical entities do not deliberate on how they behave; they do not choose to act or not according to laws of nature. (4) He goes onto say that Natural Law is concerned with how the rational human being should act. I agree that human beings were created with minds and a will which makes them capable to make reasonable decisions after giving deliberation and thought to the situation. By their complex creation and by having the freedom an d will to choose to act as they please, humans should have the ability to behave in a way that mere physical entities are not able. (4) By the above definition, this would allow human beings to choose to participate in assisted suicide if they gave it reasonable thought and deliberation and found it to be in their best interest. A reasonable human being would not choose to do something if it were not in what they saw as being in their own best interest or would provide them with optimum happiness. So where does this fall into the ethics of Natural Law? The Natural Law can be defined as a group of principles of right action which prescribes behavior for situations of morally significant choosing. (5) In the words of St. Thomas Aquinas, the Natural Law is the rational creaturers participation in the eternal law. (6) This definition implies that there are principles which have been reasoned from the Natural Law which are applicable to all people and should be used as common knowledge. Furthermore, the Bible alludes to the Natural Law as being written on the hearts of all men (7), while Aquinas referred to the general principles as being impressed on human reason by nature. (8) Any reasonable person can discern that they have within themselves the Natural Law which should provide them with the knowledge needed to help them make the appropriate decisions in whatever situation they may face. The Natural Law, whether we seem to realize it or not, influences many of the decisions that we make every day. Whether we act out of selfishness when given the opportunity or if we act selflessly and do the moral thing, we are being influenced by the Natural Law which can play such an influential role in our lives. This question of whether we are acting morally selfish or selfless can come into question when talking about the topic of assisted suicide. While some people may not be in favor of allowing assisted suicide, one could argue that by not allowing assisted suicide you are being morally selfish and inconsiderate of the person who is requesting this. The person who is asking to be allowed to end their own life in the manner that they wish, could be going through a very difficult disease or may simply have peace with dying at that given time. While some people may not agree with this means of dying, it is not up us to decide the fate of that other person. On the contrary, some people not in favor of assisted suicide may suggest that it is not that individualrs decision on whether they should end their life. And it is certainly not ours to say what they can or cannot do with the time God has given them on earth. What we can do is encourage them to live in a way that honors God and in most p eoplers eyes that would mean not committing assisted suicide or assisting someone in suicide no matter the circumstances that they are in. Giving a Biblical take on the moral law, as mentioned before in Romans 2 2:15 it says that the Natural Law has been written on the hearts of all men. (7) Since it is written in the Bible that the Natural Law is written on the hearts of all men, it should be presumed that the Natural Law should follow the moral standards of the Bible. With this said, in Exodus 20:13 it says, You shall not murder (9) which a reasonable person should stretch to the standard of You shall not murder or help someone murder. In relation to assisted suicide, the person killing themselves and the person administering or aiding in the suicide are both breaking the sixth commandment of the Bible. The big question is why is something as vile as breaking a commandment given to us by God, a commandment which is supposed to be written on the hearts of all men, so easily and frequently committed? I believe that the discussion of whether assisted suicide is moral and whether it follows under the views of Natural Law is simply a mockery of the commandments of God. While we are called by God to show others compassion and mercy, I do not see how taking oners own life and assisting in that action could be necessary and morally just by society or the government. I mention the government since it is the government who passes the laws and makes it legal to commit and to assist in assisted suicide. A government and nation which is supposed to be One nation under God (10) and by that mention, a government and nation which abides by laws given to us by God through the Bible. On the opposition of this opinion, people who do not see the need for there to be a Natural Law or for us to follow or do not recognize the Natural Law, would most likely argue that they have the freedom and ability to decide their own fate. While this may be true, and as Americanrs we are given the right to many things which can determine how our lives play out, we should not overlook the power which we are given with these decisions. The right or the ability to take oners own life is a decision which we should not have. And if someone is considering making that decision, they should be more than sure about that very final and decisive decision. Furthermore, a person who is in favor of the ability to choose assisted suicide would most likely argue that not everyoners circumstances would be the same and that there are certain circumstances which should allow for assisted suicide. For example, if an individual was in a very serious accident and there was nothing that could be done to end the pain and save their life, one could argue that the individual should be given the option to be taken off life support. Although the individual who would die is not the one administering the ending of the life support, the doctor doing it would be assisting in the death of the patient. In many peoplers eyes, this situation would seem morally just and reasonable for the practice of assisted suicide to be deemed legal and morally just. In relation to assisted suicide, the person requesting the treatment is often critically ill or has a terminal disease. In cases like these, it could be deemed rational to allow them to choose assisted suicide as a means to end their suffering. Whereas if someone were not terminally and was just having a run of bad luck with work, or injuries, they should not be able to choose assisted suicide. If the person is able to recover and return from the difficulty that they are going through, then they should not be able to choose assisted suicide. My point is, that only people who are terminal and have incurable diseases or who are in excruciating pain, in many cases would be t he only ones able to participate in assisted suicide. Another argument in favor of assisted suicide is that what if someoners quality of life is not at the optimum level and that there is nothing which could be done to improve it besides dying? If someone does not see their quality of life improving, then they would argue that they have the right to make their life better by ending it. While this might just seem outright ridiculous to some of us, it may seem rational to others. The need to be in control of their life is just as important as being alive and when an individual is not willing to give up that control, they take their own life to maintain that control. Regarding Natural Law, one with this view of dying to maintain control and happiness would say that within the moral principles there should not be a standard to measure happiness. Meaning that not everyone will find happiness in the same things that every other person will. It could be argued that this may be one of the best arguments in favor of assisted suicide. That people should be able to pursue their optimum happiness however they see fit and that there should be no hindrance on this. Normally this pursuit of happiness comes at a price, one where in normal lives we must give up something simple to have something else. In the case of assisted suicide and happiness, the thing being given up is a personrs life, which to the reasonable person would seem to be extreme measures to achieve happiness. While this seems to be a decent argument, I still believe that a reasonable person would see the actions associated with assisted suicide as ones which should not be allowed on a regular basis but only under extreme circumstances. Based on the Natural law, I do not see how assisted suicide is aligned with this law. Although I personally do not agree with it, I could see how one may request that assisted suicide be allowed if it were the only option of someone to end their pain and suffering of which there would be no other alternative other than death. In these rare cases I think that assisted suicide could be morally just by society. Furthermore, it would not fall under the Natural Law if it were not a law set in uniform for all of humanity. It would seem to go against the Natural Law if it were only applied to some people and others it was not. This is saying that some people would have a kind of excuse to be able to commit assisted suicide while others were not allowed. If this wo uld be the case, I would say just outlaw the practice of assisted suicide all together to eliminate any possible biases in the selection of who can and who cannot commit assisted suicide. This determination of who would be allowed would need to come from the government and in that case, there would be many hurdles to climb in order to get the law passed and there would be many people opposed to the idea of assisted suicide to be legal. I also believe that the criteria of who can commit assisted suicide and who is not would be very complex and would incorporate a process which would take so long that the people who are ill and request assisted suicide would die naturally before they could commit assisted suicide. In conclusion, a Natural law view would deem the act of assisted suicide as unjust and morally wrong, except for the cases when it is the only possibility for an individual to achieve happiness and be relieved of pain and suffering. While this may be a very general interpretation, I think that it is the only way that laws could be written which would allow people to use assisted suicide legally. While I personally am not in favor of assisted suicide, I do recognize how some people may see assisted suicide as being the only means to achieving happiness and relieve suffering. In the end, I firmly believe that we are to respect the gift of life which God has given us and that we are commanded to treat it with the utmost respect and honor.

Pros And Cons Of Tackle Football - 1161 Words

Youth tackle football is a popular sport for children today but this sport can have pros and cons. One of the most controversial sport that a child can play is tackle football. Tackle football is a full contact sport. In any full contact sport, there are risks like concussions, injuries and the lasting effects of those injures. There are also pros in playing this sport like teamwork, sportsmanship, character, and exercise. Youth football can also have psychological pros and cons that can affect the children that play this sport. If you are considering having your child play youth tackle football you should review all the pros and cons of playing before you make a decision. Cons of Youth Football Football has its cons just like any†¦show more content†¦While the majority of coaches are good coaches there are some who can do damage. These coaches have a â€Å"win-at-all-costs† mentality and can be really hard on the kids if they are not winning. Another psychological effect is inapposite feeling of superiority. The obsession with sport in our society can put an inflated sense of self on a child. If they are constantly winning or always making touchdowns they feel unstoppable. (Ph.D., 2015) â€Å"We must also recognize that participation in football, and team sports in general, has major benefits for fitness and character building. Participation in sports counters the major public health issues of obesity and, perhaps more importantly, the â€Å"disengagement† that we all observe in kids these days. Every parent of a teen, and even young children, realizes that a â€Å"virtual† world has often replaced the real, live interactions kids used t o regularly experience. I strongly believe that participation in team sports has a major positive influence on youth, and we cannot discount the positive impact of this aspect of football. Ultimately, if a child is passionate about football and no other sport or activity, they are almost certainly better off playing football than being inactive and alone.† (Ph.D., 2015) Pros of Youth Football When playing football, you have to work together, no one person can win or lose a game. Children will learn how to count on one another and trust your team mates. Learning teamwork skills will helpShow MoreRelatedFactors That Affect Our Everyday Lives968 Words   |  4 Pagesfirst year in football, and helping my friend with depression. One decision that I made in my life that affects me greatly is when I chose to go to Carlsbad instead of Sage Creek. When I was in the middle of deciding, I listed the pros and cons if I went to either school. One example about the pros of going to Carlsbad High is they have a football team, my older sister already goes to Carlsbad High, the people that go to Carlsbad are typically more laid back/relaxed and so on. Some pros I thought ofRead MoreEssay The Danger in Youth Sports1694 Words   |  7 Pages It was a bright, sunny, hot day at the end of august. Our football team had an amazing offensive line as we were stacked with linemen each exceeding over 200 pounds. There were many pressures on us to be a very good team and they pushed us all very hard to be the best. Practice five days a week with lifting on the other two days, no days off was our motto! Our scrimmage had gone very well that day and as it was coming to an end, the starters were out and we were taking our pads off w hen I heardRead MoreQuarterback Mobility And Its Impact On College Football Programs1541 Words   |  7 Pagespassing skills. Teams such as Carolina, Seattle, Washington, etc have been modifying their offense to best utilize the players skills, namely by implementing the zone read option offense. The zone read is a popular college offense, and in fact college football programs have for decades utilized several types of run option offenses. For various reasons, these systems have been deemed unsuitable in the NFL. A recap of the strength and weakness of both generic and specific run option offenses is presentedRead MoreCollege Athletes Should Be Paid1271 Words   |  6 PagesTimes, the 15 highest-paid NCAA football coaches made $53.4 million; meanwhile, the 13,877 Division I players made $0 In the article â€Å"College athletes ask court to reconsider part of ruling in NCAA pay case† Dan Levine is reporting that college athletes want to be paid. â€Å"College athletes asked a U.S. appeals court on Wednesday to revisit part of a ruling in a high profile case brought by athletes seeking a slice of the billions of dollars universities reap from football and basketball.† Finding theRead MoreCollege Athletes Should Not Be Paid2377 Words   |  10 Pagesmoney that goes in and out of sports, College players shouldn’t get any sort of payment from their school. College athletes should absolutely not be paid they are not professionals in any way shape or form. They are student athletes that are playing football for the school. The athletes already are put on scholarship and get money from the school there’s no need to get any extra incentives because there food, travel, and shelter is all paid for for the most part during the season so there s really noRead MoreThe Ncaa And Cbs Signed A 10.8 Billion Television Agreement Over 14 Years1371 Words   |  6 Pageslikenesses in the NCAA Football video game series. For the schools that have players who become popular. An athletic scholarship doesn’t cover all of a player’s costs. Studies have shown that, â€Å"on average, a college athlete’s scholarship leaves them about $3,200 short of the costs of attending college each year†(Kenneth Quinnell). The school will use the player’s name and popularity to make a profit for the school. Being a college student-athlete is a lot of work because, for football they have to wakeRead MoreDeforestation : A Global Problem1624 Words   |  7 Pagesthe pros and cons and what are the effects of deforestation. Overall I will prove why all of my artifacts prove the importance of deforestation and how we can stop and make a change. By the end of my argument you will be persuaded to help stop this world crisis. What is Deforestation? Deforestation is clearing earth’s forests on a huge scale usually resulting in damage of the land. Around 13 million hectares of forest and lost each year between 2005 and 2015 which is equivalent to 30 football fieldsRead MoreFeeding For The Pregnant Mom With A Toddler982 Words   |  4 Pagesfamily members, strangers, and even hospital staff will judge you in a negative way, again, because it is not widely accepted in the US culture. A good response is to say: o â€Å"I have researched the pros and cons of this tandem feeding method and found it to be safe and works well for our family.† This works well because those who are judging usually have not read up on the method. Finding a support group can help you see the positives in what you haveRead MoreMba 5652 Unit 1 Assignment - Research Proposal Topic2527 Words   |  11 PagesMBA 5652 Unit 1 Research Proposal Topic Exercise 1 My top ten research topics that I find interesting to pursue are the following: (1) approach for extra ( increase in minimum wage) income and advertising, (2) concussions in football, (3) should transportation security (TSA) regulations be changed ?, (4) should regulations regarding the use of cellular phones while driving be standardized ?, (5) should driving under the influence (DUI) laws be changed ?, (6) concealed guns be permitted in storesRead MoreUnder Armour3534 Words   |  15 Pagesbeen well received by athletes. The company currently enjoys a strong position as professional athletes and movie and video game creators clamor for its products. Nevertheless, if Under Armour wishes to say on top of its game, it will have to tackle several issues head on that could negatively impact the company in the future if they are not addressed. To name a few, Under Armour will have to deal with the potential of an economic downturn and declining retail sales, its suppliers who currently

Leadership Principles for Effective Change Free Essays

â€Å"Change only happens when each person makes a decision to implement the change.† It is very easy to talk about dreams and talk about plans. But without the commitment to follow through and implement what needs to be done, such talk is merely wishful thinking. We will write a custom essay sample on Leadership Principles for Effective Change or any similar topic only for you Order Now Every person involved in the process should implement change because everyone involved should do his part. Otherwise, the change will be incomplete. In order to manage change, the tasks that each person needs to do should be written down for implementation and monitoring. This may seem difficult and out of culture but it can do a lot in making people accountable and willing to implement the changes discussed by the organization. â€Å"A clearly defined vision of the end result enables all the people to define the most efficient path for accomplishing the results.† A vision is a powerful thing. It helps refine and enhance the direction of the organization. When a vision is clearly stated and understood by the members of the organization, they can formulate their strategies and align their activities toward the vision of the organization. Out of the vision, the strategies of the organization can be formulated. Some strategies, however, may appear not to support the end result as stated in the vision. To ensure that the strategies are aligned with the vision, an organization needs to promote its vision and its mission to its employees and to its management team. During the sessions of strategic planning, the vision should be inculcated into the minds and practices of the organization so that the strategies formulated support the fulfillment of the vision. With a clearly defined vision, the people know what they are working for. When they know what they are working for, they can search for the best approach there is. Select the two principles you believe are the most important to follow when managing change and describe why you feel these are essential. Describe some specific techniques that can be used to manage change in an organization. Explain how these techniques are consistent with the principles you selected. 1.Thought processes and relationship dynamics are fundamental if change is to be successful. 2.Change only happens when each person makes a decision to implement the change. 3.People fear change it â€Å"happens† to them. 4.Given the freedom to do so, people will build quality into their work as a matter of personal pride. 5.Traditional organizational systems treat people like children and expect them to act like adults. 6.†Truth† is more important during periods of change and uncertainty than â€Å"good news.† 7.Trust is earned by those who demonstrate consistent behavior and clearly defined values. 8.People who work are capable of doing much more than they are doing. 9.The intrinsic rewards of a project are often more important than the material rewards and recognition. 10. A clearly defined vision of the end result enables all the people to define the most efficient path for accomplishing the results. 11. The more input people have into defining the changes that will affect their work, the more they will take ownership for the results. 12. To change the individual, change the system.    How to cite Leadership Principles for Effective Change, Essay examples

Brand Journalism and Online Content Creation

Question: Discuss about the Report for Brand Journalism and Online Content Creation. Answer: The rapid development of technology and the availability of information have led to companies and organizations to invent new approaches to marketing strategies. One of the recent strategies which have received wide usage is brand journalism. Brand journalism is perceived as an art of using well researched, factual and credible information in telling a story about an organization or a company using journalistic styles with the intention of making the reader of the story want to get more information on the company or the organization (Bull 9). In addition, brand journalism is used to create online content such as blog posts, eBooks, charts, white papers, essays, graphs and videos which deliver valuable information to potential consumers as well as positioning the company or the organization as a reliable and worthy of establishing business relationship with (Light 12). Fundamentally, brand journalism has a marketing agenda, and its content is not meant for the newspaper, rather it is meant to be published either in the organization's or the company's website, social media channels or blog sites. The article aims at discussing brand journalism and online content creation with an example of brand journalism. To create brief and appealing online content brand journalism integrates elements from various disciplines which include marketing communication, public relation, and visionary planning. As a result there exists a slight difference between online content and public relation exercise for many companies a fact made possible through the use of brand journalism (Cole and Jennifer 87). However, brand journalism has proven effective in creating online content. According to a Google report an average consumer consult at least ten sources before making any purchase on the web. The example below illustrates the use of brand journalism in creating online content that consumer can identify with. The Virgin Atlantic blog is one of the best blogs that utilizes brand journalism to create informative online content to its consumers. Though, an airline company it has proven itself to be excellent in brand building, maintaining as well as creating impressive online content in their blog page. Te company social media platform are full of creative and dynamic content. Such content manifest a clear understanding of the role of brand journalism in creating online content. The blog presents Virgin brand as a personalized experience. The holiday updates invite the reader to want to know more of the company. In addition, a visitor to the site enjoys a variety of posts including the various airline myriad destinations, posts on extreme sports, and fine dining. Similarly, they write with precision and clarity about their products as well as their services. However, post regarding their product and services are a minority on their blog. From the discussion and the example, it can be concluded that brand journalism assumes different forms such as blogs, videos, essays, and pseudo- styled articles. But, the backbone of brand journalism is a well-crafted content which is aided through journalistic styles with the ability to effectively market a brand online thus, winning more customers/consumers (Du Plessis 94). Works cited Bull, Andy. Brand journalism. Routledge, 2013. Print. Cole, James T., and Jennifer D. Greer. "Audience Response to Brand Journalism The Effect of Frame, Source, and Involvement." Journalism Mass Communication Quarterly (2013). Web. Du Plessis, Charmaine. "Brand storytelling: the case of Coca-Cola's Journey Corporate Website." (2015). Web. Light, Larry. "Brand journalism: How to engage successfully with consumers in an age of inclusive individuality." Journal of Brand Strategy 3.2 (2014): 121-128. Web.